Why GNU Nano is a real Text Editor and Simple Word Processor
<< First, < Previous, Next >, Latest >>
Hosted by JWP on 2016-06-17 is flagged as Explicit and is released under a CC-BY-SA license.
Tags: editor,GNU Nano,Vi,Vim,Emacs,Kate,Gedit.
Listen in ogg,
spx, or
mp3 format. | Comments (2)
I recently heard an HPR Podcast where it was mentioned that Nano was not a real text editor. That somehow VI or Emacs or Kate or Gedit were in some way better than Nano. I just wanted to set the record straight that Nano is a serious editor that has a huge following and a facebook page.
Comments
Comment #1 posted on 2016-06-17T13:50:29Z by amunizp
+1 for nano
But a bit disapointed that it is in Facebook. I just use it and like it but not enough to join Facebook.
Comment #2 posted on 2016-06-18T10:21:39Z by 0xf10e
-1 for facebook, too
Nice show, but dude, that was some really bad noise!
You probably meant "nano is an editor for _normal_ people". I use vi-style keybindings in my shell but I have yet to notice to be imaginary ;P
Oh, and -1 for Facebook from me, too.
Nano should be careful not to be kicked out of GNU when RMS hears about this…
<< First, < Previous, Next >, Latest >>
Leave Comment
Note to Verbose Commenters
If you can't fit everything you want to say in the comment below then you really should record a response show instead.
Note to Spammers
All comments are moderated. All links are checked by humans. We strip out all html. Feel free to record a show about yourself, or your industry, or any other topic we may find interesting. We also check shows for spam :).
